Self Portrait By Lucien Freud
There's a big Francis Bacon show in NY right now at the
Met. Recently a Canadian columnist,
Barbara Kay wrote an article about it in the National Post, a right-wing newspaper I subscribe to because of, ironically, the art. It actually writes quite frequently about art + culture, etc. unlike our local paper, the Montreal Gazette. Not usually by Barbara Kay, however. I don't know what possessed her to write an article about Francis Bacon. She doesn't say she went to the exhibition. In any case I found her article very disturbing + distressing.
I'm not a huge Francis Bacon fan. I cover my eyes during gory bits in movies + the news. I hate CSI, etc. But Barbara Kay called Francis Bacon's work "so called art" + stated that it was "degenerate". Well, I studied art history + the word "degenerate" in relation to art, as BK well knows, was most famously used by the Nazis to describe virtually ALL modern art. Then, later, post war-horror Francis Bacon's early modern art works were of Nazis -- Eichmann, Hitler, Himmler, etc. Small world.
But back to the article in the National Post, entitled "A Perversion of Art" -- Ms Kay also talks about the touring exhibit Body World, which features plastinated cadavers, + Lawren Harris of the Group of 7. She mentions his great grandaughter apparently is a wheelchair erotica model.
I don't get what the cadaver freak show or Lawren Harris's grandaughter has to do with Mr. Bacon's show in NY, but that's not what really gets me. What gets me is that people like BK who has an M.A. in Literature + has taught at all sorts of Canadian schools + lectures + edits magazines + writes for a national paper, etc. would take the time and effort to so stridently crap on an art show in NY of an artist who died in 1992? Like, why? Like, where's the fire?
And why in such a virulent, clunky, unnuanced manner? Does she not care that Harper, our ultra-Conservative Prime Minister has probably posted her indictment of Bacon on his fridge door? Does she not care this government is shutting down museums? That articles like this help to enflame the red-neck "a (degenerate) monkey could paint that" crap too prevalent in Canada? Starting from the top, from a PM who thinks art is for elitists... To paraphrase the old sawhorse -- youth is wasted on the young -- education is wasted on the stup--close-minded.
Someone in BK's position, ought to be promoting the arts. Surely there is an exhibition somewhere on this planet she might encourage her readers to visit? I mean, for us Canucks, we really have to go out of our way to see Bacon's show in NY. So am I going to cancel my subscription to the National Post? + gee, today it's got this marvelous article + pics of the Vancouver architect
arthur erickson an exceedingly talented + kind man who died this week. (He once wrote a glowing letter of recommendation for me + a group of young optimistic Vancouver art school students in the 1970's to obtain an art grant to "bring art to the people". We got that grant + worked our butts off + had enough money to pay tuition in the fall.)
What evah. A national newspaper has a responsibility to publish nuanced articles + BK's rant is wayyyyyyyy over the top. It has to be a cynical move by the paper to provoke readership much like the View's use of Elizabeth Hasselbeck.
So yeah it's definitely time this knee jerk liberal stopped subscribing to the National Post. Like today. Thanks Babs. Hello Globe + Mail.